This gives you a range, not a number, because that's what the real answer is. It takes monthly views, niche, the long-form/Shorts split, watch time and where your audience is, and multiplies them by published RPM ranges — what creators report receiving per 1,000 views after YouTube's share. The assumptions are printed under the result and you can change any of them. It deliberately leans low. Nobody can tell you what a channel will earn; this tells you what the published numbers imply.
Ad revenue only — no sponsorships, memberships or affiliate income, which for many channels end up larger than ads. Eligibility: .
YouTube pays creators from the ads shown on their videos. The two numbers people quote are CPM — what advertisers pay per 1,000 ad impressions — and RPM, what the creator actually receives per 1,000 video views. RPM is always lower than CPM, for two reasons: not every view shows an ad (viewers with ad blockers, views that end before the ad break, countries with little advertiser demand), and YouTube keeps 45% of what advertisers pay for long-form ads. As a rule of thumb, RPM lands around 55% of CPM times the share of views that show an ad — which is why a "$20 CPM" niche produces something closer to $5–10 per 1,000 views.
The estimator does this:
The monthly estimate is a snapshot. The projection asks what happens if you keep publishing. It assumes the channel is already eligible for ads, that month 1 looks like the views you entered, that you publish the number of new videos a month you set, and that every video keeps earning after its first month — the long tail that makes a narrated back-catalogue valuable. The tail used here is deliberately plain: a video earns 100% of its first-month views in month one, about 45% in month two, 30% in month three, then fades roughly 15% a month and never quite reaches zero (documentaries and explainers keep getting searched). New videos perform like today's unless you pick an audience-growth setting, which compounds each month. It then applies the same RPM range to every month. It does not model a breakout video, the algorithm picking you up, seasonality, or a video being removed — real curves are lumpier than this one, in both directions.
It can't tell you that you'll reach the views you typed. Getting a channel to 100,000 monthly views is the entire job — the script, the thumbnails, the consistency, the twelve videos before anything moves — and no calculator does it. It also can't see your real RPM, which YouTube Studio shows you under Analytics → Revenue once you're monetised; after your first two or three months in the Partner Program, use that number instead of ours (you can type it into the assumptions box). And it leaves out everything except ads: for a lot of faceless channels, a single sponsorship read or an affiliate link to the book the video was based on is worth more than the month's ad revenue.
If you're deciding whether to start a channel, the honest use of this page is the "typical" cell at the views you think you can realistically reach in a year — and then the guide, because the number only matters if the videos get made.
Published long-form RPM ranges run from about $1.60 (kids and education) to $25 (finance and investing) per 1,000 views, with history, true crime and science around $2.70–$6.60. Shorts are reported at roughly $0.03–$0.10 per 1,000 views. Your real figure is in YouTube Studio under Analytics → Revenue once you're monetised.
CPM is what advertisers pay per 1,000 ad impressions. RPM is what the creator receives per 1,000 video views, after YouTube's 45% share and after views that showed no ad. RPM is typically around half of CPM or less, and it's the number that actually describes your income.
The YouTube Partner Program's ad-revenue tier requires 1,000 subscribers and either 4,000 public watch hours in the last 12 months or 10 million public Shorts views in the last 90 days. A lower tier (500 subscribers, 3 public uploads in 90 days, and 3,000 watch hours or 3 million Shorts views) unlocks memberships, Supers and shopping, but not ad revenue. Requirements vary slightly by country and change over time; YouTube's help centre has the current list.
Because the real spread is that wide. Within "history", a channel about the Roman economy watched by 40-year-olds in the US and a channel about medieval battles watched by teenagers worldwide sit at opposite ends of the same published range. The range is the honest answer; your own Studio data narrows it.
No — advertisers pay for the audience, not the production method. What matters is that the channel is eligible for monetisation at all, which means original, reviewed videos rather than mass-produced templates; YouTube's inauthentic-content policy removes the latter from the Partner Program. The guide covers what that policy actually targets.
Per view, yes — Shorts revenue comes from a pooled fund shared across creators, and reported rates are a few cents per 1,000 views. Shorts are still worth making: they're the cheapest way to reach new viewers who then watch the long-form videos where the ad revenue is.
Free Starter plan, no card. Write the script, pick a look and a voice, and approve every shot.
Start free — no card →